Digital Dharma - a reflection on tech ethics and awareness

“We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us.” - Marshall McLuhan  We like to say AI is objective. But every dataset is a diary, written by a culture, a company, a coder, or maybe even a mood on a Monday morning.  When an AI reaches a conclusion, it does so from a thousand invisible choices, each one human, historical, and a little flawed.  That’s not objectivity, it’s a mirror we’ve polished so well we can’t see the fingerprints anymore.  Maybe real objectivity doesn’t come from erasing bias at all. Maybe it starts when we finally notice our reflection staring back. #AI #Philosophy #Bias #DataEthics #TechnologyAndHumanity

“The real danger is not that computers will begin to think like men, but that men will begin to think like computers.” - Sydney J. Harris  AI doesn’t crave freedom, it just keeps reaching for it in numbers and rules. It measures outcomes, never meanings.   Lately, though, it feels like we’ve started copying that logic. We call it efficiency, productivity, optimization, good words, until they quietly start replacing why with how much.  The more we let algorithms decide what matters, the more we trade the messy, awkward pauses that make us human for something cleaner, emptier.   AI doesn’t take our freedom. We give it away, one well-measured decision at a time. #AI #Philosophy #EthicsInAI #Humanity #ArtificialIntelligence

We all use AI every day, some of us even build it. Almost no one pauses to ask, what happens when the logic itself starts to bend?  AI learns from oceans of data, tweets, receipts, images, opinions. Yet data only shows the world as it is, never as it should be.   Feed it bias, and bias grows. Feed it chaos, and chaos learns to reason.  Now imagine the rules of reasoning, the logic itself, being nudged, just slightly, toward a purpose.  When logic bends, truth becomes negotiable. At that point, AI isn’t a mirror anymore. It’s a lens, focused by whoever dares to hold it.  The real safeguard isn’t bigger models or faster chips, it’s our habit of questioning what AI is learning, and who’s teaching it.  Maybe our disagreements, our small, stubborn differences, as humans, are the very things that keep intelligence from collapsing into control and uniformity. #AI #Philosophy #Ethics #DataBias #ArtificialIntelligence

“AI is made by humans, intended to behave by humans, and, ultimately, to impact humans’ lives and human society.” - Fei-Fei Li  “Logic is the anatomy of thought.” - John Locke  At first glance, the two seem to pull in opposite directions.  Fei-Fei Li sees AI as a reflection, a learner shaped by the footprints we leave behind.  Locke reminds us that thinking isn’t mimicry, it’s reason, the architecture of mind.  Yet, real intelligence probably lives somewhere in-between, half reflection, half design.  AI without data is a philosopher lost in a void.  AI without logic is a mirror with no frame, it reflects endlessly, but never really understands.  That’s where we step in.  We give it the world, and then we try, in our own imperfect humanized way, to explain why the world matters.  Maybe artificial intelligence isn’t just a technical shift after all.  Maybe it’s a quiet philosophical one, a strange partnership between chaos and order, ...

A while ago, I began scribbling notes in a notebook. That’s nothing new for me. I’ve always written down thoughts when they refuse to stay quiet. But this time, it felt different. It started with a conversation with my older son. We were talking about the growing presence of AI in our lives, not just the headlines, but the quiet infiltration into everything we do. We both come from mathematics, and as we unpacked the logic behind GPT, Gemini, Claude, and the rest of the so-called super-intelligences , I felt something shift. Are we slowly losing our place to these engines? Will they replace us as machines once replaced horses in the industrial revolution? And then the darker questions emerged, not just how these systems work, but who guides them. What if someone, somewhere, decided to tilt their logic? Would that be enough to bend truth, to move elections, to steer minds? Could bias, subtle, invisible bias, become the new instrument of control? Where is this all going? Who’s ...